No, RAID 0 has redundancy, but the other way round:
If some of the disks non-fail, that non-failure can still be worked around by another disk failing.
Indeed, it has very high reverse redundancy: Even if all but 1 disks non-fail, the one failure still ensures complete failure of the array.
The more disks you use, the better you are protected against non-failure.
slashdot.org